Unraveling the Qurans Linguistic Layers: A Holistic Exploration of Its Sound Structure and Meaning

Authors

  • Isnainiyah UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, Indonesia Indonesia Flag Indonesia Author
  • Nasrulloh UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, Indonesia Indonesia Flag Indonesia Author
  • Nurul Ainiy IAI Sunan Kalijogo Malang, Indonesia Indonesia Flag Indonesia Author
  • Naif R. Aljohani King Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia Saudi Arabia Flag Saudi Arabia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53515/egc78871

Keywords:

Qur’anic linguistics, Rhetorical expression, Syntax and meaning

Abstract

Background: Many discussions on the Qurans language focus on one linguistic aspect at a time, leaving the relationship between sound, structure, and meaning only lightly touched. Yet the strength of Quranic expression often comes from how these elements meet and support one another.

Aims: This study seeks to understand how different layers of language, its sounds, word forms, sentence patterns, meanings, and rhetorical touches, come together to shape the tone and depth of the Quranic message. The intention is to see the text as a living linguistic whole rather than a set of separated features.

Methods: Using a descriptive qualitative approach, several passages are examined through close reading. Attention is given to how particular sounds create emphasis, how word formations expand or narrow meaning, and how sentence order shapes the flow of an idea. These observations are then compared thematically to trace recurring tendencies across the text.

Result: The analysis suggests that phonological choices often act as emotional cues. Morphology adds density to meaning, while shifts in syntax draw attention to specific ideas. Layers of semantic and rhetorical expression widen the space for interpretation. Together, these elements reveal a coordinated linguistic system rather than independent parts.

Conclusion: The study shows that Quranic language works through an intertwined structure of sound, form, and meaning. This perspective offers a more holistic way to read the text and opens opportunities for further research on how language influences readers understanding and emotional response.

References

Abd, H. F. (2025). The Self-Call in Quranic Expression (A Study in Structure and Significance). Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences, 52(6). https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v52i6.7235

Abdullah, A.-S. (2022). Fādil Al-Samarra’ī’s Contribution to Literary and Rhetorical Exegesis of the Qur’an. Religions, 13(2), 180. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13020180

Abuisaac, S. R. S., Sapar, A. A. B., Hussin, M., Ibrahim, S. N., & Huddin, M. R. A. (2025). The Satire–Hyperbole Nexus in Qur’anic Interpretation and Translation: Ideological Implications and Strategic Approaches. Quranica, 17(1), 53–79.

Agha, M. (2025). Blurring Boundaries: AI, Traditional Arab Melodies (Maqāmāt) and the Future of Qur’ānic Recitation – Rethinking Sacred Sound in the Digital Age. Journal of Islamic and Muslim Studies, 10(1), 55–83.

Ahmed, M. K., Aljubawi, B. M., & Siweedan, R. H. (2025). Lexical Agreement in Form and Meaning in Al-Miṣbāḥ al-Munīr by al-Fayyūmī: A Synchronic Study of Semantic Pairs. Dragoman, 2025(19), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.63132/ati.2025.lexica.04818680

Alavi Nia, M. (2025.). Lost in translation: Unravelling the lexical intricacies of trust in Arabic. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 0(0), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13530194.2025.2461100

Almjlad, S. S. A. (2025). Semantic untranslatability in Quranic discourse: Challenges and contextual remedies in English translation. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 12(1), 2542336. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2025.2542336

Alqbailat, N. M., Alqubelat, E. F., Al Kaabi, M. H., & Almaamari, A. S. (2025). Patterns of Religious, Cultural, and Literary Rhetorical Elements Usage Among Non-Native Arabic Learners: A Case Study at Mohamed bin Zayed University for Humanities. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 15(3), 898–909. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1503.25

Alsharif, R. S. (2025). Hyperbole in Arabic YouTube: A pragmalinguistic study of artificial intelligence discourse. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1085. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05215-x

Al-Shboul, O. K. (2025). Metaphorical framing of sad and happy narratives in Jordanian Arabic: A cognitive-discursive perspective. Training, Language and Culture, 9(2), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.22363/2521-442X-2025-9-2-31-42

Bengueddach, A. (2025). Multi-Dimensional NLP Analysis of the Quran: Structure, Semantics, and Emotion across Qirāʾāt. QURANICA - International Journal of Quranic Research, 17(1), 32–52.

Coşkun, M. (2025). The Qurʾān’s Self-References to its Arabic Register. Hitit Theology Journal, 24(1), 363–380. https://doi.org/10.14395/hid.1615562

Frishkopf, M. (2023). Localized Timbres and Tonalities of Qur’ānic Recitation: From Africa to Indonesia. Journal of Islamic and Muslim Studies, 8(1), 36–57.

Haroun, Y. (2025). The Essential Role of Arabic Linguistics and Etymology in Qur’anic Translation. Journal of Islamic and Muslim Studies, 10(1), 106–121.

Harvey, H. (2022). When Mothers Can’t “Pay the Cost to Be the Boss”: Roles and Identity within Doubled-Up Households. Social Problems, 69(1), 261–281. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spaa022

Hassanein, H. (2023). Less Form, More Meaning: A Case Study of al-Iẖtibāk in the Qur’an Through the Prism of Dependency Grammar. Sage Open, 13(4), 21582440231199921. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231199921

Ismail, S., Reza, M. F., Jusoh, M. H., Awang, W. S. W., & Juahir, H. (2023). Psychospiritual Healing from al-Quran: Internal Aesthetic Factor of Quranic Sound and Its Effects in Activating Greater Brain Regions. Malaysian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 19(4), 583–606. https://doi.org/10.11113/mjfas.v19n4.2969

Jin, B., Liu, G., Han, C., Jiang, M., Ji, H., & Han, J. (2024). Large Language Models on Graphs: A Comprehensive Survey. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 36(12), 8622–8642. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2024.3469578

Kaltsum, L. U., & Amin, A. S. (2024). The Development of Qur’anic Thematic Exegesis in Indonesia: Historical Landscape and Shifts of Authority. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis, 25(2), 296–319. https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.v25i2.5422

Kazim, M. H. I., & Hwerf, N. A. (2025). THE REPLACEMENT OF ONE SOURCE WITH ANOTHER WHEN BOTH CONVEY A SIMILAR MEANING. TPM - Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 32(S4), 1908–1919.

Kolade, O., & Owoseni, A. (2022). Employment 5.0: The work of the future and the future of work. Technology in Society, 71, 102086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102086

Kupriyanov, R. V., Bukach, O. V., & Aleksandrova, O. I. (2023). Cognitive complexity measures for educational texts: Empirical validation of linguistic parameters. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 27(3), 641–662.

Levesque, K. C., Breadmore, H. L., & Deacon, S. H. (2021). How morphology impacts reading and spelling: Advancing the role of morphology in models of literacy development. Journal of Research in Reading, 44(1), 10–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12313

Liu, P., Ren, Y., Tao, J., & Ren, Z. (2024). GIT-Mol: A multi-modal large language model for molecular science with graph, image, and text. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 171, 108073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108073

Martino, B. D., & Cortese, A. (2023). Goals, usefulness and abstraction in value-based choice. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 27(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2022.11.001

Pissani, L., & de Almeida, R. G. (2023). Early Birds Can Fly: Awakening the Literal Meaning of Conventional Metaphors Further Downstream. Metaphor and Symbol, 38(4), 346–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2023.2225561

Rashwan, H. (n.d.). Literary Genre as a Theoretical Colonization by Modernism: Arabic Balāghah and its Literariness in Ancient Egyptian Literature. Retrieved November 15, 2025, from https://dx.doi.org/10.5325/intelitestud.23.1.0024

Reyes, R. L., & Villanueva, J. A. (2024). Narrative-Based Concept Representations: Fostering Visual Cognition in the Introductory Chemistry Classroom. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(3), 1106–1119. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c01151

Reyes-Molina, D., Alonso-Cabrera, J., Nazar, G., Parra-Rizo, M. A., Zapata-Lamana, R., Sanhueza-Campos, C., & Cigarroa, I. (2022). Association between the Physical Activity Behavioral Profile and Sedentary Time with Subjective Well-Being and Mental Health in Chilean University Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(4), 2107. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042107

Salem, Z. A. (2021). Global Shinqīṭ: Mauritania’s Islamic Knowledge Tradition and the Making of Transnational Religious Authority (Nineteenth to Twenty-First Century). Religions, 12(11), 953. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12110953

Samsul Hady, M., Roibin, Teguh Prastyo, A., Bakar, A., Faslah, R., Malik Fajar Alam, A., Barkah, Q., Himmatin, U., Nuyulis Naeni Puspitasari, I., & Abdul Ghani, M. Z. (2025). Cultural transformation: Religious moderation from manuscripts heritage to living tradition in Indonesia and Malaysia. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2556891. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2556891

Turner, S., & Littlemore, J. (2023). Literal or metaphorical? Conventional or creative?: Contested metaphoricity in intense emotional experiences. Metaphor and the Social World, 13(1), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.00028.tur

Yazar, S., & Batur, İ. (2025). Rhetorical Transformation in the Qurʾān and Pre-Islamic Poetry: A Comparative Analysis of Space, Animal, and Natural Figures. Religions, 16(9), 1186. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16091186

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

Unraveling the Qurans Linguistic Layers: A Holistic Exploration of Its Sound Structure and Meaning. (2025). Learning, Media and Technology in Arabic Education, 1(2), 96-106. https://doi.org/10.53515/egc78871